12.31.06
Counsels of the Aged to the Young (2)
This is the second part of Archibald Alexander’s Counsels to the Young.
“2. WHILE you are young, avail yourselves of every opportunity of acquiring useful knowledge. Reason should guide us; but without correct knowledge reason is useless; just as the most perfectly formed eye would be useless without light. There is in every man a natural thirst for knowledge, which needs only to be cultivated and rightly directed… The sources of information are innumerable: the principle, however, are books and living men. In regard to the former, no age of the world which has passed was favoured with a multiplicity of books as our own… Many books are useless, others are on the whole injurious, and some are impregnated with a deadly poison… Seek the advice of judicious friends in the choice of books.
But you may also learn much from listening to the conversation of the wise and good… Cherish the desire of knowledge, and keep your mind constantly awake and open to instruction from every quarter. But, especially, I would recommend to you the acquisition of self-knowledge. ‘KNOW THYSELF’ was a precept held in…high esteem among the ancients… And this species of knowledge is also inculcated in the Christian Scriptures as the most useful and necessary. ‘Examine yourselves,’ says Paul, ‘whether you be in the faith; prove your own selves; know ye not your own selves?’ And in the Old Testament the value of this knowledge is also fully recognised, where we are exhorted ‘to commune with our own hearts’, and ‘to keep our own hearts with diligence’… As this knowledge is necessary to all, so it is placed within the reach of all. To this duty there exists in human nature a strong repugnance, partly from natural and partly from moral causes, so that by most it is entirely neglected, to their exceeding great detriment. But, when it is attempted, we are in great danger of being misled by self-love and prejudice… The mind must be enlightened in regard to the standard of rectitude to which we ought to be conformed. ‘The entrance of thy Word giveth light.’ The Word of God should dwell richly in us, and by the rules and principles of the sacred volume we should form all our sentiments respecting ourselves. This is the candle of the Lord which searcheth the inward parts of man; and without such a lamp it would be as impossible to obtain any considerable degree of self-knowledge, as to distinguish the objects in a dark room without a light…
Beware of the common illusion of forming your estimate of yourselves from the favourable opinions of those around you. They cannot know the secret principles from which you act, and flattery may have much influence of leading them to speak in your praise. Seize favourable opportunities of judging the latent strength of your passions. The fact is that, until some new conjuncture or occasion elicits our feelings, we are as ignorant of what is within us, as other persons. Study also your constitutional temperament, and consider attentively the power which particular objects and circumstances have over you. You may often learn from your enemies and calumniators what are the weak points in your character. They are sagacious in detecting faults, and generally have some shadow of pretext for what they allege against us. We may therefore derive more benefit from the sarcasms of our foes than from the flattery of our friends.
Learn, moreover, to form a correct estimate of your abilities, as this is necessary to guide you in your undertakings.
3. BE careful to form good habits. Almost all permanent habits are contracted in youth, and these do in fact form the character of the man through life. It is Paley, I believe, who remarks that we act from habit nine times, where we do once from deliberation. Little do young persons apprehend the momentous consequences of many of their most frequently repeated actions. Some habits are merely inconvenient, but have no moral quality; others affect the principles of our conduct, and become sources of good or evil to an incalculable degree…
4. BE particular and select in the company which you keep, and the friendships which you form. ‘Tell me,’ says the proverb, ‘what company you keep, and I will tell you what you are.’ ‘Evil communications corrupt good manners.’ Vice is more easily and extensively diffused by improper companions, than by all other means. As one infected sheep communicates disease to a whole flock, so one sinner often destroys much good, by corrupting all the youth who fall under his influence… The friendship of profligate men is exceedingly dangerous… Form no close alliance with such. No more think of taking them to your bosom, than you would a viper… ‘Be not unequally yoked together with unbelievers’, is the exhortation of Scripture… Seek a connection with the wise and good, and you will become wiser and better by converse with such.
5. ENDEAVOUR to acquire and maintain a good reputation. ‘A good name is rather to be chosen than great riches.’ A ruined fortune may be recovered, a lost reputation never. Young men are often laying the foundation of an unenviable reputation, while they are thinking of no such thing… A stain on the character is not easily washed out; at a distant period the faults and follies of youth may be revived to a man’s confusion and injury. But especially is the female character exquisitely delicate. A small degree of imprudence will often fix a stigma on the gay young lady, which no subsequent sobriety can completely erase… The reputation which we recommend must arise from a life of consistent and uniform well-doing. Prize such a character, as of inestimable value to your own peace, and as a most powerful means of usefulness. The most potent human engine of utility is influence; and this depends entirely on reputation.”
Part Two
G.M.
Part One
12.29.06
The Scottish Church and Charles I
Charles I began his reign in 1625 having been conditioned by his father to believe that ‘the king in his sole person was superior to all law, civil or ecclesiastical.’ Eight years later, in 1633 he came to Scotland were the Church still languished under the articles of Perth. However, national opposition to Episcopacy was intensifying as the nobility in particular began to repent of their part in bringing such folly upon the Church. McCrie comments ‘about this period, everything was prepared for an explosion.’ It only took Archbishop Laud to light the fuse.
Laud published a new liturgy in which much of the communion service was lifted straight out of the Mass book, and the king appointed this to be read in the churches. On the 23rd July 1637 Dean Hanna conducted the service in St Giles cathedral Edinburgh, using the prescribed liturgy. As he began to read, Janet Geddes cried out ‘Villian, dost thou say Mass in my lug!’ before throwing her stool at the dean’s head. In this act, the long suppressed feelings of the nation burst forth. A tumult ensued, spreading through the city and beyond, and was soon taken up by the higher classes as the whole country roused to follow Edinburgh. Supplication was made to the king for the suppression of the service book which he rejected, demanding its immediate reception under pain high treason. The nobility, barons and the Church continued their protest and together agreed to renew the National Covenant which was sworn on 1st March 1638 in Greyfriars churchyard. This was done to defend the liberties of the Church and to save the country from absolute despotism. It was signed amid scenes of great contrition for national breaches of the covenant together with great enthusiasm as it appeared a new day dawned in Scotland.
Charles immediately planned a military invasion, but under the guise of conciliation he granted the Church freedom to convene a General Assembly. 140 ministers and 98 elders gathered from 21st November – 20th December 1638 in Glasgow, Alexander Henderson presiding as moderator. It was here that the Church arose in her might from thirty years of Episcopal slumber. The bishops were tried with exercising an office that the Assembly had condemned (8 were excommunicated while 6 were either suspended or deposed). The 6 Assemblies of James’ reign on the English throne were nullified and the Articles of Perth, the service book, canons, and high commission renounced. Moreover, by a unanimous vote it was moved to remove Prelacy and restore Presbyterianism. As the Assembly came to a close Henderson dismissed them with a solemn warning ‘We have now cast down the walls of Jericho; let him that rebuildeth them beware of the curse of Hiel the Bethelite.’
Events also took a turn in England. The parliament became increasingly disaffected with Royal despotism and civil war broke out. The Scots understood that ‘their only hope as Presbyterians and as patriots, lay in the success of the English parliament.’ In mid 1643 the military situation of the parliamentary forces looked bleak and they issued a plea to Scotland for a civil league and military assistance. The Scots however favoured a religious Covenant and the result was ‘The Solemn League and Covenant’ binding the three kingdoms of England, Scotland and Ireland to ‘the extirpation of popery, prelacy…’ and ‘the reformation of religion in England and Ireland in doctrine, worship, discipline and government… to bring the Churches of God in the three kingdoms to the nearest conjunction and uniformity in religion, confession of faith, form of Church government, directory for public worship and catechising…’ To achieve this, the English parliament called an assembly of divines to Westminster which commenced on 1st July 1643 and was attended by 6 Scottish commissioners. This assembly produced the Westminster Confession of Faith, the Larger and Shorter Catechisms, the Directory for the Public Worship of God, and the Form of Church Government all of which were ratified by the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland by 1648.
G.B
12.26.06
Random Preaching and the Edification of the Church
We have been indebted to Archibald Alexander in recent days for a number of posts. Quite independently of these I stumbled across a very interesting footnote in James Garretson’s ‘Princeton and Preaching.’ It has to do with Alexander’s view of random and unconnected preaching.
“Alexander felt that preaching from single sentences and isolated texts had little tendency to give ’solid instruction.’ He explained to his students that a scripturally informed judgment can only arise from from biblically based exposition of larger passages of Scripture. The Biblical Repertory also warned against the growing tendency toward isolated textual preaching: ‘But we also know, that to compose a sermon upon a text of Scripture, with very little reference to its position in the Word of God, and very little inquiry as to the intent of the Spirit in the words, is a thing not only possible but common; the evil grows apace, wherever the rhetorical aspect of preaching attracts undue attention, the desire to be original, striking, ingenious, and elegant, supersedes the earnest endeavour to be Scriptural.’
G.B.
12.21.06
Counsels of the Aged to the Young (1)
The following is from Thoughts on Religious Experience, by Archibald Alexander – from letters at the back of the book.
“It is a matter of series regret that young persons are commonly so little disposed to listen to the advice of the aged. This prejudice seems to have its origin in an apprehension that austerity and rigour naturally belong to advanced years; and that the loss of all susceptibility of pleasure from those scenes and objects which afford delight to the young produces something of an ill-natured or envious feeling towards them. Now it cannot be denied that some of the aged are chargeable with the fault of being too rigid in exacting from the youth the same steady gravity which is becoming in those who have lived long, and have had much experience in the world: not remembering that the constitutional temperament of these two periods of human life is very different. To the young, everything in the world wears the garb of freshness; and the novelty and variety of the scenes presented keep up a constant excitement. These traits of youthful character, as long as irregularity and excess are avoided, are not only allowable, but amiable; and would in that age be badly exchanged for the more sedate and grave emotions which are the natural effects of increasing years… But it is greatly to be desired that the lessons of wisdom taught by the experience of one set of men should be made available for the instruction of those who come after them. We have, therefore, determined to address a few short hints of advice to the rising generation, on subjects of deep and acknowledged importance to all; but previously to commencing, we would assure them that it is no part of our object to interfere with their innocent enjoyments, or to deprive them of one pleasure which cannot be shown to be injurious to their best interests…
1. RESOLVE to form your lives upon some certain principles, and to regulate your actions by fixed rules. Man was made to be governed by reason, and not by mere accident or caprice. It is important, therefore, that you begin early to consider and inquire what is the proper course of human conduct, and to form some plan for your future lives. The want of such consideration is manifest in the conduct of multitudes. They are governed by the impulse of the moment, reckless of consequences. They have fixed no steady aim and have adopted no certain principles of action. Living thus at random, it would be a miracle if they went uniformly right. In order to your perusing a right path, you must know what it is, and to acquire this knowledge, you must divest yourselves of thoughtless giddiness, you must take time for serious reflection. It will not answer, to adopt without consideration the opinions of those who may be about you, for they may have some sinister design in regard to you, or they may themselves be misled by error or prejudice… Exercise your own reason independently and impartially, and do not give yourselves up to be governed by mere caprice or fashion, or by the opinions of others.”
Part One
G.M.
12.14.06
Filthy Dreamers
For your consideration. Thomas Boston in his ‘Fourfold State’ when dealing with the corruption of the mind, treats the sins of our imaginations and dreams.
‘Consider how the carnal imagination supplies the want (lack) of real objects to the corrupt heart, that it may make sinners happy at least in the imaginary enjoyment of their lusts. Thus the corrupt heart feeds itslef with imagination-sins; the uncelan person is filled with speculative impurities, “having eyes full of adulteries” 2 Pet 2:14; the covetous man fills his heart with the world, though he cannot get his hands full of it; the mailcious person with delight acts his revenge within his own breast; the envious man, within his own narrow soul, beholds with satisfaction his neighbour laid low; and every lust finds the corrupt imagination a friend to it in time of need.
This the heart does, not only when people are awake, but sometimes even when they are asleep; whereby it comes to pass, that those sins are acted in dreams, which their hearts pant after when awake. I am aware that some question the sinfulness of these things; but can it be thought that they are consistent with that holy nature and frame of spirit that was in innocent Adam, and in Jesus Christ, and should be in every one? It is the corruption of the nature, then, that makes filthy dreamers condemned Jude 8. Solomon had experience of the exercise of grace in sleep: in a dream he prayed, in a dream he made the best choice; both were accepted of God 1 Kings 3:5-15. And if any man, in his sleep, do what is good and acceptable to God, why may he not also, when asleep, do that which is evil and displeasing to God?
The same Solomon would have men aware of this, and prescribes the best remedy against it, namely, “the law upon the heart” Prov 6:20-21. “When thou sleepest” says he “it shall keep thee,” to wit, from sinning in thy sleep; that is from sinful dreams: for a man’s being kept from sin, not his being kept from affliction, is the immediate proper effect of the law of God impressed upon the heart Ps 119:111.’
12.12.06
The Scottish Church and James VI
It was inevitable that trouble would arise in Scotland after the Reformation because her successive monarchs all maintained the Erastian principle of their supremacy in ecclesiastical affairs and desired the imposition of Episcopacy on the Scottish Church.
James VI ascended the throne in 1578 and, to the encouragement of the Church, he signed the National Covenant in 1581 safeguarding the Protestant religion in his realm. However, in 1584 he passed ‘The Black Acts’ which asserted his authority in temporal and spiritual affairs; denied the right of free assembly to the Church; made it a treasonable offence to speak in contempt of the king or decline his judgement in any matter; and required all ministers to acknowledge the bishops as their ecclesiastical superiors. Later, in 1592 due to political expediency he formally restored Presbytery by an act of parliament which continued to be the legal charter of the Church of Scotland. In this, the Black Acts were repealed and the spiritual independence of the Church was asserted, nevertheless James continued to vacillate and it was not long before the liberties of the Church were overthrown again.
During this period Andrew Melville championed the cause of Presbytery in Scotland. ‘The secret of James antipathy to presbytery’ writes McCrie ‘was his ambition to be regarded as head of the Church.’ This desire was checked in no uncertain terms by Melville when in 1596 he found himself among a deputation who had an audience with the king. James’ manner toward them was most hostile in charging them with holding seditious meetings. Melville responded by taking him by the sleeve, addressing him as ‘God’s sillie vassal’ and informing him ‘…there are two kings and two kingdoms in Scotland: there is James, the head of this Commonwealth, and there is Christ Jesus, the king and head of the Church, whose subject James VI is, and of whose kingdom he is not a king, nor a lord, nor a head, but a member…’ With men so principled, fearless, and influential, the king was unable to gain power over the General Assembly for now.
In 1603 James ascended the throne of England and it was not long before a conference was held to hear the complaints of the English Puritans. There, the English prelates adored him as governor of the Church so that that James thanked God that he had brought him into ‘The promised land’ Then Dr Reynolds made a plea for Presbytery which moved James to declare that ‘Presbytery agreed as well with monarchy as God and the Devil’ before pronouncing his famous maxim ‘No bishop, no king!’ His hostility towards Scottish Presbyterians thus intensified, he resolved to make them conform to the English Church and set out to break the power of their General Assemblies. He postponed the 1604 Assembly and attempted a further postponement, but nineteen faithful ministers convened in Aberdeen, July 1605. The king ordered the privy-council to proceed against those involved as guilty of high treason with the result that six ministers, including John Welch, were banished from the kingdom in 1606. Melville was later arrested in England 1607 and imprisoned in the tower of London for four years before being exiled to France in April 1611.
The strength of opposition from the Church courts started to diminish as the affects of James’ banishment policy were felt. As a result, the 1610 Assembly were bribed and intimidated into accepting Episcopal moderators and a latitudinarian spirit appeared among some ministers. James knew that he was making progress and came to Scotland in 1617 prevailing upon the parliament that his appointments in the Church be received as law and that ‘the bishops must rule the ministers and the king must rule both.’ Fifty six ministers submitted a protest to the king who banished a number of them before proposing to the clergy five articles of conformity to the English Church. These were ratified by the Perth Assembly in August 1618 and are known as the 5 Articles of Perth. They marked the lowest ebb in the Scottish Church’s contendings for the sole headship of Christ in his Church.
The five articles of Perth were: 1. Kneeling at Communion. 2. The observance of certain Holydays such as Christmas, Good Friday and Easter. 3. Episcopal confirmation. 4. Private administration of Baptism. 5. Private administration of the Lord’s Supper.
G.B
12.05.06
Calvin on the Papacy
I have been looking through parts of Calvin’s ‘Necessity of Reforming the Church’ of late and this section struck me for its clarity and the boldness of the Reformer’s Speech. He is writing a defence of the Reformation (1543) to to ‘The Most Invincible Emperor, Charles V, and The Most Illustrious Princes and Other Orders, now holding a diet of the Empire at Spires.’ Responding in particular to the charge of ’schism’ made against the Reformers, Cavin treats of the error of the Papacy. The publisher (PHP) include a number of headings in the side columns of the pages, this one reads ‘The Papacy is Antichrist.’
‘The Roman Pontiff is now opposing himself to the reviving doctrines of the gospel, just as if his head were at stake. Does he not, by this very fact, demonstrate that there will be no safety for his see unless he can put to flight the kingdom of Christ? Your imperial majesty is aware how wide a field of discussion here opens upon me. But to conclude this point in a few words: I deny that see to be apostolical, wherein nought is seen but a shocking apostasy; I deny him to be the vicar of Christ, who, in furiously persecuting the gospel, demonstrates by his conduct he is Antichrist; I deny him to be the successor of Peter, who is doing his utmost to demolish every edifice that Peter built; and I deny him to be the head of the Church, who by his tyranny lacerates and dismembers the church, after dissevering her from Christ, her true and only Head. Let these denials be answered by those who are so bent on chaining the heirarchy of the church to the Roman see, that they hesitate not to subordinate the sure and tried doctrines of the gospel to the autority of the pope. Yea, I say, let them answer; only do you, most invincible emperor, and most illustrious princes, consider whether, in so calling upon them the thing I ask is just or unjust.’
G.B