01.30.07

Andrew Melville (2) – A Forgotten Reformer.

Posted in Biographical & Historical at 12:24 am by puritanismtoday

The Second part of a lecture delivered in the Free Church Seminary by Rev Ronald Mackenzie

Church Reform: Assertion of Presbyterian Principles in opposition to Prelacy.
Melville’s fame rests not only on his far-sighted educational reforms but, more significantly, his advocacy of church reform in government and discipline as the champion of presbyterianism as opposed to prelacy. King James favoured episcopacy with its lordly bishops as being in agreement with his own ideas of spiritual despotism over the affairs of the church as well as those of the state – the bishops being useful tools in securing the enforced compliance of the Scottish Church and her people to his royal will. Bishops were beholden to the king for their exalted office and manifested their gratitude to him by flattery and fawning servility. But Melville and others likeminded were not afraid to preach faithfully against wrong-doing and sinful practices by all classes in society – not excepting the king and his royal household! Hence James’ intense dislike of presbyterianism which he said, “agrees as well with monarchy as God and the devil”!

Against this royal despotism with its invasive erastianism and the encroachments of an avaricious nobility Melville fearlessly contended. In a letter to Beza he highlights the difficulties he encountered: “For five years we have maintained a warfare against pseudo-episcopacy and have not ceased to urge the adoptiom of a strict discipline. We have presented to his Majesty and the three estates of the Kingdom (i.e.Scotland) at different times, and recently at the parliament which is now sitting, a form of discipline to be enacted and confirmed by public authority…….almost all the nobility are averse. They complain that if pseudo-episcopacy be abolished the state of the kingdom will be overturned; if presbyteries be established, the royal authority will be diminished; if ecclesiastical goods are restored to their legitimate use, the royal treasury will be exhausted…….They plead that bishops, with abbots and priors, form the third estate in parliament; that all jurisdiction, ecclesiastical as well as civil, pertain solely to the king and his council, and that all the ecclesiastical property should go to to the exchequer…….They also insist that the sentence of excommunication shall not be held valid until it has been approved by the king’s council. For…while they judge according to the dictates of the carnal mind instead of the revealed will of God, they desire to have everything done by the authority of a single bishop and perpetual overseer of the churches, rather than by the common sentence of presbyters possessing equal authority.” (McCrie: Life of Melville.Vol.1,p.202)

At the opening of a General Assembly in 1582, Melville as moderator preached against those who were determined to introduce despotic power into the nation and attempting ‘to erect a new popedom’ in the person of the king. He then took the lead in presenting a bold remonstrance on the matter to the king and council from the Assembly, and boldly subscribed the paper in face of the regent Arran’s threats, followed by his brethren. In l584 Melville was summoned before the privy council on charges of treason allegedly found in a sermon he preached, but acting on advice from friends, escaped Scottish jurisdiction by retreating to Berwick. In 1596 he accompanied a deputation of ministers to King James at Falkland palace where, taking the king by the sleeve and calling him ‘God’s sillie vassal’, Melville uttered the famous words: “Therefore sir….I must tell you that there are two kings and two kingdoms in Scotland; there is King James, the head of the commonwealth, and there is Christ Jesus, the King of the Church, whose subject James the Sixth is, and of whose kingdom he is not a king, nor a lord, nor a head, but a member…..you are not the head of the Church; you cannot give us that eternal life which we seek for even in this world, and you cannot deprive us of it.” (McCrie::Life of Melville,Vol.1,p.391).

However, following the union of the crowns in 1603 and James’ accession to the English throne, Melville was summoned to London in 1607 where he was imprisoned in the Tower for 4 years. Thereafter he was banished to France where, during his eleven year exile, he taught in the University of Sedan, dying there in 1622.

Part 2

01.26.07

The Westminster Standards and Exclusive Psalmody – Brian Schwertley

Posted in Worship at 2:20 pm by puritanismtoday

The historical practice of the Reformed Church is one element often introduced to the debate on Exclusive Psalmody. Churches who hold to the singing of uninspired materials of praise, and who also hold to the Westminster Standards frequently argue that the clause ‘Singing of Psalms with grace in the heart’ is to be understood generally of songs of praise and not exclusively of the Psalms of the Biblical Psalter. Brian Schwertley rejects this position on good grounds below, arguing that the Westminster Standards maintain an Exclusive Psalmody position (Mr Schwertley is applying his comments in particular to the history of Presbyterianism in America).

“That the Westminster standards endorse Exclusive Psalmody is proven by the following points.

1. The Westminster Confession of Faith’s enumeration of the parts of ordinary worship lists ‘the singing of psalms with grace in the heart (21:5) not the singing of psalms and hymns.

2. The Directory for the Public Worship of God says, ‘It is the clear duty of Christians to praise God publicly, by the singing of psalms together in the congregation, and also privately in the family.’ In the immediate context the directory mentions the use of a ‘psalm book’ and the lining out of the psalms for those who cannot read. This observation proves that the word ‘psalms’ refers explicitly to the canonical psalms of Scripture. Therefore, ‘psalms’ in the directory is not a general term referring to any sacred song used in religious worship as many un-inspired hymn advocates assert.

3. The minutes of the Westminster Assembly show beyond a shadow of a doubt that the Assembly of divines only permitted the 150 canonical psalms of the Bible to be used in public worship (see Brian Schwertley , Exclusive Psalmody: A Biblical Defense [Covenanted Reformation Press: Haslett, MI, 2002], Appendix. Available free at www.reformedonline.com).

4. Presbyterians did not allow uninspired hymns for about 250 years, until 1788 when the PCUSA Directory changed the original Westminster Directory’s ‘singing of psalms’ to ‘singing of psalms and hymns.’ The first official Presbyterian hymn book did not come into existence until 1831. (For an excellent account of how and why Presbyterians abandoned exclusive psalmody see Michael Bushell, The Songs of Zion: A Contemporary Case for Exclusive Psalmody [Pitsburg: Crown and Covenant, 1993 (1980)], p197-217.)

The reason for considering Church history is: if the early Presbyterians actually believed that the term ‘psalms’ was general and included uninspired religious songs, then why did they purposely exclude them for centuries? To ignore the Presbyterian practice of Exclusive Psalmody – both before, during, and after the Westminster Assembly – and then to import a meaning into the Word ‘psalm’ that explicitly contradicts the early Presbyterian belief and practice with regard to public worship is exegesis of the worst sort. Furthermore, if the Westminster divines intended the term ‘psalm’ to include uninspired hymns, then they were negligent, hypocritical, and sinful for forbidding what they believed God required.”

01.24.07

Andrew Melville (1) – A Forgotten Reformer.

Posted in Biographical & Historical at 12:08 am by puritanismtoday

The first part of a lecture delivered by the Rev Ronald Mackenzie in the Free Church Seminary.

Born near Montrose in 1545, Melville was destined to bring the great work of Reformation begun by Knox to greater completion through the establishment of Presbyterianism as the distinctive form of church polity in Scotland. For this he was eminently qualified by the Great Head of the Church. A man of indomitable courage and zeal for the glory of God and the spiritual welfare of his fellowcountrymen, he possessed both outstanding organising ability and the highest educational attainments of his day. His father was whole-heartedly in sympathy with the pre-Reformation movement for reform. An elder brother studied under Melancthon while Melville himself heard John Knox preaching about the year 1556 ( prior to the establishment of the Reformation in 1560). A precocious and exceptionally talented and diligent student, acquainted with the gospel and its saving power in his own experience, Melville went up to St.Andrews’ University in l559 – knowing more of the Greek language than his professors!

Seeking to further his studies, Melville thereafter resided for 10 years in Europe where he added to his stores of learning, studying Hebrew in France and theology in Geneva under Beza (with whom he formed a lasting friendship) and where, at the age of 21, he became professor of Latin – soon acquiring European fame as an outstanding scholar in the literary world.

Melville’s character was not unlike that of Knox, – possessing the latter’s unbending courage, manly firmness and moral integrity along with the advantages of wider scholarship and literary attaiments. When he returned to Scotland in 1574 he was admirably equipped to lead the Scottish Reformed Church in her conflict with royal despotism in its attempts to force prelacy upon her. He boldly asserted and defended the Church’s independent jurisdiction under the Headship of Christ from the usurpations of secular, political interference.

Educational Reforms
Melville’s sagacity combined with his continental educational experience and knowledge of Jesuit intrigue, led him to see the necessity for a well-educated ministry who could by their learning, knowledge of the original languages of Scripture and exegetical skills, resist and overcome the plausible specious arguments of the agents of the Counter-Reformation movement who were actively seeking to seduce unstable protestants to return to the Roman fold. With tireless energetic zeal, Melville began a series of necessary reforms in university education; firstly at Glasgow where, in 1574, he was appointed principal of the university while at the same time carrying out his duties as minister of Govan, and secondly at the the new college (St. Mary’s) of St.Andrews, in each case revising the curriculum and raising the standard of Scottish higher education – his primary concern being the necesity for not only a godly but also an educated ministry. Combining the dual role of both a minister and a professor of divinity allowed him the right of of sitting in church courts where he showed outstanding debating skills in arguing his case for both educational and church reform.

Melville’s aims were (1) to improve the scope and standard of Scottish education; (2) to make it unnecessary for students to go to Europe to further their education and where they were in danger from prosleytising Jesuits operating in European seats of learning and who had already won over a number of Scots students; and (3) to enable theolgical students by their facility in the original languages and biblical knowledge to overcome the arguments of their Romish adversaries. As a result of his university reforms there was an upsurge in student numbers and during his tenure as principal of St.Andrews such was its fame that it attracted students from the continent – reversing the previous trend! Melville’s influence upon the minds of a younger generation of ministers was profound – men who in their generation were being prepared to contend for the same principles as Melville and whose long struggles for the liberties of the church were to be crowned with eventual success at the renewing of the National Covenant and the 1638 reforming General Assembly at Glasgow.

01.22.07

Counsels of the Aged to the Young (4)

Posted in Femininity & Masculinity, Personal Holiness at 3:47 pm by puritanismtoday

This is the fourth part of Archibald Alexander’s Counsels to the Young.

“The reflections to which I have been led in speaking of consistency of Christian character suggest the importance of urging upon you the government of your passions. A man who has no control over his passions is justly compared to a ship at sea, which is driven by fierce winds, while she neither is governed by the rudder nor steered by the compass. By indulgence, the passions gain strength very rapidly; and when once the habit of indulgence is fixed, the moral condition of the sinner is most deplorable, and almost desperate. To preserve consistency, it is necessary to be well acquainted with the weak points in our own character, to know something of the strength of our own passions, and to guard beforehand against the occasions and temptations which would be likely to cause us to act inconsistently with our Christian profession. Many men have successfully contended with their own passions, and although naturally of a hasty and irritable temper, have, by constant discipline, brought themselves into a habitual state of equanimity; so that however they may be conscious of the strugglings of the natural passions, they are kept so completely under restraint, that to others they do not seem to exist… Learn then, my young friends, to bridle your passions, and govern your temper, from your earliest days.

8. Be contended with the station and circumstances in which Providence has placed you. Never repine at God’s dealings towards you, nor envy those who are above you in worldly advantages. Consider not so much what you lack, as what you have; and look less at those above you, than at those in inferior circumstances. Accustom yourselves to look on the bright rather than the dark side of the picture. Indulge not in unreasonable fears, nor give way to feelings of despondency. Exercise fortitude and maintain tranquility of mind… Place not your happiness at the disposal of every one who may be disposed to speak an unkind word, or do an unhandsome thing.

9. Let your intercourse with men be marked by a strict and conscientious regard to truth, honour, justice, kindness, and courtesy. We should certainly have recommended politeness, as a happy means of polishing social intercourse, and affording pleasure to those with whom you are conversant; but many are accustomed to connect an unpleasant idea with this word. But surely, genuine politeness, if not itself a virtue, spreads a charm and a beauty over that which is virtuous. And certainly there is no merit in awkwardness and clownishness. But our chief object under this particular is to urge upon you a constant and punctilious regard to the social virtues. Be honest, be upright, sincere, men of your word, faithful to every trust, kind to every body, respectful where respect is due, generous according to your ability, grateful for benefits received, and delicate in the mode of conferring favours…”

Part Four

G.M.

Part One, Two, Three

01.19.07

It never fails to make me smile!

Posted in Doctrine at 2:30 pm by puritanismtoday

The Great Debate on the existence of God between Greg Bahsen and Gordon Stein is perhaps familiar to many of you. I particularly enjoy Bahnsen’s argument and wit at this point. It reminds me that God will confound the wisdom of the wise and bring to nothing the understanding of the prudent, that he who sits in the heaven shall laugh!

Dr. Bahnsen
Okay; I heard you mention logical binds and logical self contradictions in your speech. You did say that?

Dr. Stein
I used that phrase, yes.

Dr. Bahnsen
Do you believe there are laws of logic then?

Dr. Stein
Absolutely.

Dr. Bahnsen
Are they universal?

Dr. Stein
They are agreed upon by human beings. They aren’t laws that exist out in nature. They are…

Dr. Bahnsen
Are they simply conventions then?

Dr. Stein
They are conventions, but they are conventions that are self verifying.

Dr. Bahnsen
Are they sociological laws, or laws of thought?

Dr. Stein
They are laws of thought which are interpreted by men; and promulgated by men.

Dr. Bahnsen
Are they material in nature?

Dr. Stein
How can a law be material?

Dr. Bahnsen
That’s a question I’m going to ask you!
Thank you.
[audience laughter]

Dr. Stein
I would say no.

Cross Examination: Dr. Stein questions Dr. Bahnsen.

Dr. Stein
Dr. Bahnsen, would you call God material or immaterial?

Dr. Bahnsen
Immaterial.

Dr. Stein
What is something that’s immaterial?

Dr. Bahnsen
Something not extended in space.

Dr. Stein
Can you give me an example of anything other than god that’s immaterial?

Dr. Bahnsen
Laws of logic.
[ Audience Laughter ]
[David: Can I ask that you hold that down please?]

01.12.07

Review Majesty in Misery – The Judgement Hall, C. H. Spurgeon.

Posted in Reviews at 10:39 am by puritanismtoday

This is the second in a compilation of Spurgeon’s sermons on the passion and death of our Lord. In particular this volume focuses on Christ under Trial before Annas and Caiaphas the religious leaders of the Jewish nation, Herod Antipas and Pontius Pilate. The various sermons were not preached as a series but have been complied from the 63 volumes of Spurgeon’s sermons. They are arranged in order of scripture history and not by the date the pastor preached them.

Those familiar with Spurgeon’s preaching will know that he was not really a systematic and expository preacher. This is evident in this volume of sermons which does not read like a series. Each sermon stands alone, and because often a period of years passes between consecutive sermons we discover considerable repetition and overlap, while at the same time other areas are not touched on. This may be taken negatively or positively because as the reader makes his way through the book he is having certain points constantly reinforced.

What these sermons are replete with is Orthodox doctrine set in its Biblical historical context, warmly and eloquently applied. The enemies of the truth are targeted. Rome and her ‘Priestcraft’ are linked with the Pharisees; Liberal theology is exposed as the seed of the Saducees. As for the individual saint and sinner there is no hiding place. Considering Him who in infinite love suffered such contradiction of sinners against himself Spurgeon ably reveals the enmity of the natural man to Christ and passionately presses the reception of His mercy and salvation by those who are lost. To the Lord’s people he gives wise counsel, comfort and constant stimulus to persevere in a life of obedience bearing the reproach of Christ. Additionally there is much practical instruction in how to do this.

One quote is given as an example of his preaching on the love of Christ and its affect on the Christian: ‘Nothing stirs our hearts depths like his hearts anguish. Nothing is too hard for us to attempt or to endure for One who sacrificed himself for us… such love so swells our hearts that we vehemently pant for some way of expressing our indebtedness… his wounds cause even hearts of stone to bleed. His shame makes obstinacy itself ashamed…’ p48.

We commend it as a profitable and edifying read with one note of caution. In the final paragraph of p72 we read ‘What a short time it is since Adam walked in the Garden of Eden; compared with the ages of the rocks, compared with the history of the stars, compared with the life of God, it is as the winking of an eye, or as a flash of lightning…’ Spurgeon seems to be influenced here by the theory of evolution and one would have expected a footnote to this effect by the publishers but it passes without comment.

01.10.07

Counsels of the Aged to the Young (3)

Posted in Femininity & Masculinity, Personal Holiness at 2:30 pm by puritanismtoday

This is the third part of Archibald Alexander’s Counsels to the Young.

“6. Manage your worldly concerns with economy and discretion. Avoid the inconvenience, embarrassment, and vexation of being in debt [Once people saved for things they needed or desired, now we get all immediately on credit; thus we lose the discipline of saving and waiting, and increasingly fall into debt. G.M]… My counsel…is, that you commence and pursue business with prudence; and when unfortunate, that you so act as to preserve your integrity and reputation, by resorting to no equivocal means of relief; but resolve to act in conformity with the strictest rules of justice and honour.

7. Aim at consistency in your Christian character. There is a beauty in moral consistency which resembles the symmetry of a well-proportioned building, where nothing is deficient, nothing redundant. Consistency can only be acquired and maintained by cultivating every part of the Christian character. The circle of virtues must be complete, without chasms or obliquities. A character well proportioned and nicely balanced in all its parts, we are not very frequently permitted to witness; for, while in one branch there is vigour and even exuberance, in another there may be the appearance of feebleness and sterility. The man who is distinguished for virtues of a particular class is apt to be deficient in those that belong to a different class. This is so commonly the fact, that many entertain the opinion that the same person cannot excel in every virtue. Thus it is not expected that the man of remarkable firmness and intrepidity should at the same time be distinguished for meekness and gentleness. But after making due allowance for a difference of constitutional temperament, we must maintain that there is not, nor can there be, any incompatibility between the several virtues of the Christian life…

As all truth is harmonious, however it may, on a superficial and partial view, seem to be contradictory, so all the exercises of moral goodness are not only consistent, but assist and adorn each other. This is so much the case, that symmetry of Christian character has, by some distinguished casuistical writers, been laid down as a necessary evidence of genuineness; and it has been insisted on, as probable, that where one virtue seems to exist in great strength, while others are remarkable wanting [lacking], it is a mark of spuriousness.

There is much reason in this view of the subject; for men are frequently found whose zeal blazes out ardently and conspicuously, so as to leave most others far back in the shade, while they are totally destitute of that humility, meekness and brotherly kindness which form an essential part of the Christian character. Some men are conscientious and punctilious in the performance of all the rites and external duties connected with the worship of God, who are inattentive to the obligations of strict justice and veracity in their intercourse with men: and on the other hand, many boast of their morality, and yet are notoriously inattentive to the duties of religion.

Real Christians, too, are often chargeable with inconsistency, which arises from a want of clear discernment of the rule of moral conduct in its application to particular cases; for while the general principles of duty are plain, and easily understood by all, the ability to discriminate between right and wrong in many complicated cases is extremely rare… It is too commonly taken for granted that Christian morals are a subject so easy that all close study of it is unnecessary. This is an injurious mistake… On no subject will you find a greater diversity of opinion, than in regard to the lawfulness or unlawfulness of particular practices: and even good men are often thrown into difficulty and doubt respecting the proper course to be pursued.

But while many cases of inconsistency arise from ignorance of the exact standard of rectitude, more must be attributed to heedlessness and forgetfulness. Men do not act sufficiently from principle, but too much from custom, from fashion, and from habit… Another cause of inconsistency so commonly observed, is the prevalence which certain passions or appetites may obtain, in the time of temptation… As the venomous adder seems to be harmless while chilled with cold, but soon manifests his malignity when brought near the fire, so sin often lies hid in the bosom, as though it where dead, until some exciting cause draws it forth into exercise; and then the person himself is surprised to find the strength of his own passions, above anything which he had before conceived. Thus men often act, in certain circumstances, in a way altogether contrary to the general tenor of their conduct. It is by no means a fair inference from a single act of irregularity, that the person who is guilty of it has acted hypocritically in all the apparent good actions of his former life. The true explanation is, that principles of action which he has commonly been able to govern and restrain, acquire, in some unguarded moment, or under the power of some strong temptation, a force which his good principles are not at that moment strong enough to oppose. The man who is usually correct and orderly may thus be overtaken in a fault; and as all are liable to the same frailties, there should exist a disposition to receive and restore an offending brother, when he gives sufficient evidence of penitence…

Young persons ought, therefore, to begin early to exercise this vigilance, and to keep their hearts with all diligence, lest they be ensnared by their own passions, and overcome by the power of temptation. I counsel you then, my young friends, to aim at consistency. Cultivate assiduously every part of the Christian character, so that there may appear a beautiful proportion in your virtue.”

Part Three

G.M.

Part One, Two

01.04.07

Christian Education and Multicultural Israel

Posted in Education & Homeschooling at 4:05 pm by puritanismtoday

After the death of Joshua and the elders of Israel that were contemporary with him we enter into the period of the Judges. This is one of the darkest periods of Church History when Israel had no king and every man did that which was right in his own eyes. The generation that followed Joshua’s ‘knew not the Lord nor yet the works that he had done for Israel’ 2:10 and as a result they forsook the Lord and served other Gods.

The root of the problem can be traced to the failure of the preceeding generation in their conquest of the land. They did not drive out all of the Canaanites and as a result a multicultural society was created in which many different faiths dwelt together. In the days in which Othniel the first Judge of Israel arose, Israel had forgotten their God and served Baalim and the groves Judges 3:7. The multicultural society proved a breeding ground for moral relativism. Mingled with the people of the land, intrigued by the novelty of their religions and perhaps with a desire to appear tolerant of them, it was not long until they were intermarrying and worshipping the gods of the Canaanites. While they were familiar with their own history as a Redeemed people and the great works which God had done for their fathers they deemed such things largely irrelevant to their new society.

Twenty first century Britain is clearly a multi-cultural society and it looks back upon its Christian past with a patronising smirk. If we continue to give our children to a system in which they will be educated in the philosphy of this society we cannot but expect that the children of the covenant will think, as in the days of the judges, that the faith of their parents and grandparents is irrelevant to this age. Two generations of covenant children have swallowed the lie and are found no longer in the Church. How many more must be lost before our attitudes are changed and our responsibilities are owned?

G.B